HSAs for the Uninsurables
May 14th, 2007I was talking with a 44-year old about applying for an individual health insurance policy. This person was not happy with insurance companies. Frankly, the following is not my favorite conversation to have with a client:
“I’m afraid the insurance company will decline your application for health insurance.”
“But why? I’m healthy!”
“I understand, but let me see if I can explain the problem. You are indeed healthy, but you are also taking three quite expensive medications. You take a cholesterol medication, an allergy medicine, and a sleep medication. The cost is about $300 per month or $3,600 per year.” (To show the client the real cost of prescriptions, I usually visit a site that shows prescription drug prices, such as www.drugstore.com.)
“But, I’m healthy. I exercise every day. My doctor only gave me the Lipitor because my cholesterol is slightly elevated. Lots of people in California have allergies. My job is stressful and the occasional sleep medication helps me sleep.”
“I understand, but look at it from the insurance company’s perspective. At age 44, the premium would be $275 per month for the $1,500 deductible plan. While you would pay a $25 co-pay for each drug, the real cost is $100 per drug. The insurance company would have to pay the remaining $75. Each month, they would pay out almost as much for these prescriptions as your premium.
“Well, can I get a plan without prescription drug co-pays? I only want insurance for the big expenses.”
“That’s a reasonable request. Normally, when people are declined for coverage, they realize they want insurance for what it was intended to do — provide protection from large, unexpected medical bills, such as a three to four day hospital stay that averages $30,000. Insurance companies include prescription drug coverage with their traditional HMOs or PPOs. There is an HSA-qualified high deductible health plan without drug co-pays, but the cost of your drugs contributes towards the deductible. Let’s say the insurance company has a $3,500 deductible plan. If your drug costs were $3,600, you would satisfy your deductible with your drug costs alone. Now, if you had to go to the hospital at the end of the year, all your hospital expenses would be covered since you would end up having a zero deductible plan.”
“Can’t they just exclude drug coverage altogether?”
“I wish they could, but virtually all plans include benefits for prescription drugs and office visits.”
“Can’t they exclude coverage for these conditions and give me insurance for big problems, such as a serious accident, heart surgery, or cancer?
“Insurance companies in California no longer exclude certain conditions; they accept or decline your coverage.”
Finally, the client says with frustration, “What good are insurance companies? When you want to get pure insurance, you can’t get it. I hope we end up getting some form of national healthcare so that those greedy insurance companies get their just rewards.”
Pure Insurance Is the Solution
Guaranteed-issue plans are too costly for many people who end up becoming part of California’s uninsured population. I can offer a guaranteed-issue HIPAA health plan with a $450 per month premium to a person who is coming off of COBRA. For those not coming off COBRA, I could write the guaranteed-issue MRMIP plan with substantially reduced benefits and a $600 premium.
The solution may be pure insurance, which is strictly for the large, unexpected medical bills. It may provide options to the major risk plan or HIPAA.
California is poised for change; people are increasingly angry and frustrated with insurance companies for denying coverage and constantly raising premiums. The California legislature passed single-payer legislation, which Governor Schwarzenegger vetoed; he later presented his own plan for California, which featured a mandate for all Californians to have health insurance. With mandatory insurance, the insurance companies would no longer be able to deny coverage. Governor Schwarzenegger proposed a $5,000 deductible health plan with a $7,500 out-of-pocket maximum as the minimum level of coverage. Surprisingly, California duplicated Massachusetts’ mistake of choosing a non-HSA qualified plan as the core plan.
I hope that they will correct that oversight. Insurance companies could go a long way towards solving the uninsured problem by offering pure catastrophic coverage that is HSA compatible. I call it “The HSA Strategy,” in which you buy insurance for large unexpected medical bills and use the HSA to pay routine costs and save for future expenses. The following are some options to consider:
• A Starting point – An HSA-qualified plan with a $3,500 deductible and a $100 a month premium (age 40 to 44) – This could be a popular option. It most resembles pure insurance and has a very affordable premium. The insured pays everything under the deductible and the insurance company pays everything over deductible. To keep the premiums low, this plan excludes maternity coverage. Also, preventive exams are subject to the deductible. Following the age-rating system, premiums for younger people would be lower, while premiums for older people would be higher. Premiums would be $60 a month for a 25-year old and $200 a month a 55-year old.
• Step 1: Increase the deductible – An HSA-qualified plan with a $5,250 deductible and a $100 a month premium. Insurance companies could decrease their risk by using the maximum allowable deductible for an HSA-qualified plan (currently $5,250). By charging the same premium as for the $3,500 plan, they could collect some additional premium to offset the higher risk individual.
• Step 2: Modify the plan to be more like pure insurance – An HSA-qualified plan with no coverage for office visits or prescriptions, a $5,250 deductible, and a $100 a month premium – People who face the prospect of having no insurance and who worry about big claims would find this policy appealing. A visit to a family doctor is a cost of daily living, just like taking the car to an auto shop is a cost of owning a car. These routine expenses are not insurable events since they are neither large nor unexpected. A prescription that costs $100 per month or $1,200 per year is expensive, but it is a small cost compared to a $500,000 spinal cord injury. The premium is the same as the regular $3,500 plan, but the insurance company doesn’t have to pay for office visits or prescriptions and the deductible is $5,250.
• Step 3: Reasonable Rate-Ups – Some level of moderate rate = +10% up would be appropriate if the insurance company is still worried about the risk of insuring someone who is taking several medications or who has another underlying risk factor:
A 25% rate up = $100 x 1.25 = $125
A 50% rate up = $100 x 50% = $150
A 100% rate up = $100 x 2 = $200
If I could offer one of the plans above, I would be able to get coverage for a person who was declined. Premiums under $200 are more appealing than $400 to $600 premiums. Also, the insurance company’s risk is greatly lessened with these plans. These HSA-compatible plans are also simple to understand.
When Governor Mitt Romney of Massachusetts proposed the universal health plan, he projected the premium for the pool of people to be around the $200 a month. In reality, the policy ended up costing $380 per month. Massachusetts tried to have the plan cover too much and included too many state-mandated benefits. They would have reached their cost projections if they had they offered pure insurance like the plans above.
The Real Role for the Major Risk Pool
The plans listed above might not work for uninsured people who have impending surgeries or large ongoing medical bills. Now we have a place for the major risk pool; it should be for people who indeed have major risks. If Governor Schwarzenegger is serious about the uninsured problem, the government and the insurance companies should team up to subsidize this high-risk pool. Over the years, some of these people will regain their health and move out of this risk pool into a regular plan.
Insurance companies need to lead the charge in changing how they deal with people who have higher levels of risk. If they fail to do so, it may be time for the government to mandate some form of guaranteed issue plans. I think it’s better for the insurance company to act than for the government to compel action.
–––––––––
Robert Hopper, Ph.D., is the owner of Hopper Insurance Services in Santa Barbara. He is the author of a continuing education textbook for insurance agents on HSAs and “Healthcare Happily Ever After: A Friendly Little Tale of the Health Savings Account and How It Won the Heart of a Nation.” To reach him, call 805-966-4900 or visit www.BobHopperInsurance.com.